Archive for May, 2009

#LRNY – I am an ‘assclown’ and a stalker!

Just when I thought the dust had settled on this one, up popped a tweet to me from someone called Jess Elliot.  This said:

@RichardStacy Seriously Dick, you’re a one trick pony, can’t u come-up with anything else other than talking about #LRNY? You’re so boring.

The tone of this had the ring of some familiarity about it given previous tweets and blog comments from people that seemed to be interestingly close to the agency involved in the #LRNY campaign.

It was also a little at odds from comments such as this from Corrine Weisgerber, Assistant Professor of Communication at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas, who has done an excellent presentation on usage of Twitter.  She said:

@RichardStacy Somehow I overlooked your tweet. Great post on #LRNY. I agree:  not authentic & executed with a traditional marketing mindset

So, I wondered who Jess Elliot might be Continue reading ‘#LRNY – I am an ‘assclown’ and a stalker!’

Nik Gowing on crises and social media

Here is some worthwhile weekend reading.  It is a report by the broadcast journalist, Nik Gowing, published this week by Oxford University’s Reuter’s Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Entitled “Skyful of Lies and Black Swans” it looks at how technological changes and the emergence of what he calls ‘information doers’ (essentially social media) is changing the balance of power between institutions and individuals, with this shift being most evident at moments of crisis.

The paper tends to focus on government and politics in terms of the examples it highlights, rather than corporations and boardrooms.  It is also more on the observational and assertive side of things and rather light on analysis, in terms of really exposing the key new dynamics of the social media space.  However, this is to be expected given that Gowing is a journalist, not an analyst or academic.

I also sense that Gowing himself has not fully grasped the implications of the social media revolution, seeing it as simply an evolution of technology rather than recognising the fundamental breakdown in the relationship between content and distribution that social media represents.  He identifies the effects, but not yet fully appreciates the cause.  He recognises instances of institutional impotence, but not the fundamental shift from institutions to processes inherent in social media.

It is also a shame that the report itself is not more social media optimised – Gowing doesn’t appear to be available to discuss this on twitter, or have a blog for example and there are no links embedded in the pdf.  The opportunity to use this to create a conversation has clearly not been identified! (Update: he is on twitter @NikGowing but not exactly active)

However, minor gripes aside, the real value in this paper is the force with which it makes the point about the level of institutional denial (in governments and boardrooms) about what is happening, together with an identification of the fact that vastly increased speed of response is what crisis management is now all about.  Gowing calls this the Tyranny of the Time Line.

Read it and think about your own crisis management preparation and/or level of institutional denial.

Free content is not the issue – its free distribution

There has been a lot of chatter recently about the issue of  newspapers charging for their on-line content – driven by Rupert Murdoch’s speculation that this is what he, and the industry is going to have to do very shortly.

However, the issue is not free content.  What is killing traditional news providers is free distribution.

The price that Murdoch et al have to charge for their content is driven by the fact that their organisations are chained to expensive distribution models.  Organisations that don’t have that ball and chain can afford to give their content away because their costs are so much lower they can cover these via advertising alone. Continue reading ‘Free content is not the issue – its free distribution’

The sanctity of publication

Thanks to Antony Mayfield (@amayfield) for drawing my attention to a couple of recent  articles.  It has prompted me to finally post on something that has been lurking  in the back of my mind for a year or more – this thing I call the sanctity of publication.

Both articles – one a piece in the Daily Mail and the other a opinion piece by Seth Finkelstein in the Guardian – come from very different people and places but both are essentially the same: cries of indignation from people and/or institutions who see their position as ‘sanctified’ oracles being undermined by the great unwashed. Continue reading ‘The sanctity of publication’