<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There are only four relevant conversations in social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/</link>
	<description>Social media consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Herring</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Herring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=283#comment-359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Richard,

After mulling this over a bit, I think you may be right. At least for social media engagement by business.

But for consumers, I&#039;m not sure we could count the number of relevant conversations - since we&#039;re interested in much more than a given product or service. As a result, the definition of &quot;relevant&quot; gets a lot looser. A perceptive insight for one man is pointless babble to another.

Yet we should all engage in what is important to us and natural communities will form. If we&#039;re interested enough, we&#039;ll engage in conversation with a business. Hopefully the business will be interested enough to listen and participate!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>After mulling this over a bit, I think you may be right. At least for social media engagement by business.</p>
<p>But for consumers, I&#8217;m not sure we could count the number of relevant conversations &#8211; since we&#8217;re interested in much more than a given product or service. As a result, the definition of &#8220;relevant&#8221; gets a lot looser. A perceptive insight for one man is pointless babble to another.</p>
<p>Yet we should all engage in what is important to us and natural communities will form. If we&#8217;re interested enough, we&#8217;ll engage in conversation with a business. Hopefully the business will be interested enough to listen and participate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardstacy</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardstacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=283#comment-348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Angela,

Corporate reputation is essentially all about the &#039;corporate story&#039; which is really what the third area of converstaion is all about - i.e. the &#039;who is, what is, where doeas it come from&#039; converstaion.  The challenge for organisations is to work out their corporate story - and this gives them the creative brief to guide this area of converstaion and also the guide to what type of content they need to produce to bring the corporate story to life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Angela,</p>
<p>Corporate reputation is essentially all about the &#8216;corporate story&#8217; which is really what the third area of converstaion is all about &#8211; i.e. the &#8216;who is, what is, where doeas it come from&#8217; converstaion.  The challenge for organisations is to work out their corporate story &#8211; and this gives them the creative brief to guide this area of converstaion and also the guide to what type of content they need to produce to bring the corporate story to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Diamond</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angela Diamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=283#comment-347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, in essence, it is that simple.   The only time it gets a little fuzzy is when incorrect rumours gain momentum and if the product isn&#039;t very clear.  I&#039;m really refering to behaviour which isn&#039;t very becoming - corporate reputation.

Angela]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, in essence, it is that simple.   The only time it gets a little fuzzy is when incorrect rumours gain momentum and if the product isn&#8217;t very clear.  I&#8217;m really refering to behaviour which isn&#8217;t very becoming &#8211; corporate reputation.</p>
<p>Angela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-13 &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2009-08-13 &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=283#comment-341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There are only four relevant conversations in social media « Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting (tags: me)    Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI     Leave a comment Click here to cancel reply. Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;pre&gt; &lt;del datetime=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are only four relevant conversations in social media « Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting (tags: me)    Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI     Leave a comment Click here to cancel reply. Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;pre&gt; &lt;del datetime=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some of the Best of Web Media &#8211; August 12, 2009</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/08/12/there-are-only-four-relevant-conversations-in-social-media/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some of the Best of Web Media &#8211; August 12, 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=283#comment-340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There are only four relevant conversations in social media Can it really be this simple? Most likely. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are only four relevant conversations in social media Can it really be this simple? Most likely. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

