<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The sanctity of publication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/</link>
	<description>Social media consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Its not about citizens becoming journalists &#8211; but journalists becoming citizens &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Its not about citizens becoming journalists &#8211; but journalists becoming citizens &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 09:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] model, both in terms of capital but also prestige.  At its heart is the death of the concept of the sanctity of publication.  In the old world the simple act of publication conferred status upon content.  But this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] model, both in terms of capital but also prestige.  At its heart is the death of the concept of the sanctity of publication.  In the old world the simple act of publication conferred status upon content.  But this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Rusbridger, Dan Gillmor, the future of journalism and the Great Schism between the Ism and the Ist &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Rusbridger, Dan Gillmor, the future of journalism and the Great Schism between the Ism and the Ist &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The sanctity of publication [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The sanctity of publication [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Rushbridger, Dan Gillmor, the future of journalism and the Great Schism between the Ism and the Ist &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Rushbridger, Dan Gillmor, the future of journalism and the Great Schism between the Ism and the Ist &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The sanctity of publication [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The sanctity of publication [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Einstein’s Twitter stream: quality content or pointless babble? &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Einstein’s Twitter stream: quality content or pointless babble? &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to put it another way – the act of publication no longer has any scarcity of and thus confers no status upon the content published.  We can say anything, and status only becomes attached to our utterances in accordance with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to put it another way – the act of publication no longer has any scarcity of and thus confers no status upon the content published.  We can say anything, and status only becomes attached to our utterances in accordance with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Twitter encouraged journalism? &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Has Twitter encouraged journalism? &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] them off.  They (especially individual journalists) are accustomed to commanding what I call the sanctity of publication. The fact that this advatage is now available to all (and therefore no longer an advantage) makes [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] them off.  They (especially individual journalists) are accustomed to commanding what I call the sanctity of publication. The fact that this advatage is now available to all (and therefore no longer an advantage) makes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social media: its not a clamour for attention &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Social media: its not a clamour for attention &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is a very old-fashioned view, based on the fact that in the traditional media world attention was everything because attention meant advertising revenue or book or record sales.  It is also a very convenient view amongst those in what we might call the information elite because, as with the label citizen journalist, it provides them with a stick with which to beat social media in their battle to retain sanctity of publication. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a very old-fashioned view, based on the fact that in the traditional media world attention was everything because attention meant advertising revenue or book or record sales.  It is also a very convenient view amongst those in what we might call the information elite because, as with the label citizen journalist, it provides them with a stick with which to beat social media in their battle to retain sanctity of publication. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for the BBC to get its act together &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Time for the BBC to get its act together &#171; Richard Stacy @ Stacy Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to this view.  As I have previously said, it is all to do with the ending of their monopoly on the sanctity of publication.  This sort of approach would be fine if it came from a News Corp programme or journalist who [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to this view.  As I have previously said, it is all to do with the ending of their monopoly on the sanctity of publication.  This sort of approach would be fine if it came from a News Corp programme or journalist who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apologies &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apologies &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;for the record pieces&#8221; on the shift from institutions to process and the issue of the sanctity of publication (Clay Shirky re-tweeted this which pleased me no end)  Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;for the record pieces&#8221; on the shift from institutions to process and the issue of the sanctity of publication (Clay Shirky re-tweeted this which pleased me no end)  Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Differing Views of Social Media &#124; The SSRN Blog</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Differing Views of Social Media &#124; The SSRN Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stacy had an interesting blog post about journalism and the sanctity of publication. In this post he discusses the indignant attitude of journalists as it relates to the social media [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stacy had an interesting blog post about journalism and the sanctity of publication. In this post he discusses the indignant attitude of journalists as it relates to the social media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardstacy</title>
		<link>http://richardstacy.com/2009/05/07/the-sanctity-of-publication/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardstacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardstacy.com/?p=184#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most certainly - all contentless adolation (adulation?) welcome]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most certainly &#8211; all contentless adolation (adulation?) welcome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

